Paul Pattison /Veronique Ingram/ITSA

It appears Veronique Ingram, Inspector General in Bankruptcy needs a big cock up her ARSE.......................
I refer to  the following from Hansard in May 2012 where Senator Williams questioned Veronique Ingram on Paul Pattison....................

Senator WILLIAMS: Folks from ITSA, I want to take you to a couple of issues. I want to take you to Mr Paul Pattison—you would be familiar with the name?

Ms Ingram : Yes.

Senator WILLIAMS: He was deregistered as a trustee in bankruptcy after he had voluntarily resigned from his 272 active matters in July last year. I think I have raised this issue of Mr Pattison with you before. I want to raise with you a matter that involved Mr Pattison and Mr Alex Kane Mircevski, of Victoria. You would be familiar with this long-running battle with Mr Pattison?

Ms Ingram : I am aware of some of the issues, yes.

Senator WILLIAMS: I refer to a letter dated 12 August 2009 signed by you, Ms Ingram. It is a response to complaints Mr Mircevski made to the Attorney-General on 17 and 8 July 2009. You refer to a letter dated 19 June 2009 which indicated the conduct of the trustee was not considered inappropriate. What investigations of Mr Pattison led your Bankruptcy Regulation Branch to that conclusion?

Ms Ingram : It is important to note that the trustee, Mr Pattison, has been deregistered. I do not want to reveal the details of that deregistration, but it principally related to his lack of resources to run a trustee business, if you can call it that. The companies he was using, in terms of his corporate insolvency practice, had gone into voluntary administration. Another one had gone into liquidation. We were examining his systems and files and also came to the view that, after those procedures had happened, he no longer had the resources to undertake a trustee business. As to the issue with Mr Mircevski, yes we did review his matter and we did not uncover any improper conduct on the part of the trustee.

It would appear that Veronique Ingram  definitely needs a good fuck up the arse to help her recall that Bankruptcy Relations had received 9 complaints about Pattison in the 12 months prior to his de-registration. 5 of these complaints warranted investigation.  Freedom of information, Dave Maher from ITSA did not acknowledge whether there was any investigation carried out  on any  complaint.

Eight trustees voluntarily resigned during 2011–12 and one trustee registration was cancelled
involuntarily. The lone decision to cancel involuntarily has been appealed in the AAT
The Inspector-General also commenced disciplinary action against a further two trustees for
failing to exercise their powers or carry out their duties properly. This action required the trustees
to show cause as to why they should not have their registrations cancelled. In both instances
the Inspector-General was not satisfied with the response from the trustees and took action to
convene statutory committees to determine if the trustees should remain registered

So why did the eight Trustee's resign in 2011-2012 and who was the trustee that had his registration cancelled involuntarily????
Was there somebody more shonkey than Paul Pattison??? It is on the court records that Paul Pattison voluntarily resigned!!!
Who in ITSA is protecting serious corrupt conduct and fraudulent activities???????????????
 Veronique Ingram is ultimately responsible, though what part is Adam Toma responsible for  and is Adam Toma  and skanky Veronique Ingram in this together????
Adam Toma is profiting from his  involvement  in this.

A very serious question now should be asked................. is Adam Toma protecting corrupt trustee's  for a slice of their action.
Also is Adam Toma using insider knowledge to force people in financial difficulty to sell their property to him at a huge discount????
How very funny when I start my property searches on Adam Toma  and senior Management at ITSA................... also  who else is Adam Toma involved with that also warrants investigation into their financial dealings????????????

FOI Australian Public Service Commission

As the Australian Public Service Commission has fucked over  everyone who made a complaint about Agency or Department Heads or by whistleblowers except one which was investigated and covered up by the fucker Robert Cornell AO who had been the Secretary for the Attorney General Department for 8  years  I have  now asked for the names of the people  who took the time to complain to the APS Commission.

I will then be able to look these people up on the electrol roles and ask them for a copy of their complaint and post it on this blog.
This will show how the Commissioner Steve Sedgwick and the skanky ethics manager fuck over anyone who complains and brings it to the attention of the APS

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com

To: foi@apsc.gov.au
Subject: RE: FOI Request [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:45:19 +1100

Hi Chris,
Thank you for your email on whistleblowers.
As you are unable to provide me with  a copy of the complaints to the Australian Public Service Commission by Whistleblowers and also under S41(f) of the PS Act for the past 2 financial years because the APS Commission claims this would breach confidentiality and therefore are exempt from FOI  could you please supply me ( under FOI) with the names of the  people that made these complaints and the states they  live  and  I will contact these people direct.
Thanking you
Fiona Brown

Senator John Faulkner/Commonwealth Ombudsman

Here is  another Senator wanking his own COCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Although  this  fucker  has considerable political experience he fails to  UNDERSTAND the Commonwealth Ombudsman does not have an investigation policy.

The Commonwealth Ombudsman only  receive the enormous amount of complaints because there is NO  transparency and no investigation  policy . Senator Faulkner must have his fist up he arse to even to even contemplate thinking   this way.

 According to the  Ombudsman  Act,it is an obligation for the Commonwealth Ombudsman to expose Administrative  Deficiency  in Government Departments.

Senator Faulkner is aware this is not carried out according to the  Ombudsman's Act.

Senator Faulkner needs a good fuck up the ARSE  and so do all his office staff for covering this up!!!!

***********************************

There is much work that the Commonwealth Ombudsman does. It is not just a complaints hotline. The Ombudsman serves as an important purpose of following up on individual citizen's cases as well as conducting investigations, producing reports to assist agencies ensure transparency and making submissions to parliamentary inquiries. I think the work of the Commonwealth Ombudsman is critically important. I commend its work and I commend the annual report of the Commonwealth Ombudsman to the Senate.

WHAT SHIT coming from this fucker from the Australian Labor Party!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**********************************************

Senator FAULKNER (New South Wales) (18:50): In relation to the Commonwealth Ombudsman's annual report 2011-12, I move:


  That the Senate take note of the document.


As senators would be aware, the Commonwealth Ombudsman is the first port of call for many Australians who believe that they have been aggrieved by an executive decision. The ombudsman, as we know, is a pillar of our administrative law regime in Australia. Without the Commonwealth Ombudsman, many Australians would not have an opportunity to seek review of an executive decision. Their only option, really, would be to proceed through the Administrative Review Tribunal or through the Federal Court via the ADJR Act. Despite costs orders, the prohibitive cost of litigation means that, without the Commonwealth Ombudsman, review of government actions would simply be out of reach for so many of those people who need it most. This annual report provides some very interesting statistics. Over the past year the number of complaints to the Commonwealth Ombudsman has increased from 38,919 to 40,009. I acknowledge that this is a double-edged sword because although 40,000 Australians felt aggrieved enough by decisions of the executive government to complain to the Ombudsman, it is heartening that so many Australians are seeking justice through the merits review the Commonwealth Ombudsman provides. On the positive side, the number of complaints that related to correctness, propriety or timeliness of agency decisions or actions was down from 72 per cent to 70 per cent.
 

But unsurprisingly the agency which tops the list of complaints is Centrelink, then Australia Post, the ATO, child support and immigration round out the top five. Over the last three years the number of complaints about Centrelink to the Commonwealth Ombudsman fell, but in 2011-12 the number of complaints rose. The report identifies accessibility to Centrelink as a common ground for review. The report notes that telephonic communication with Centrelink can be problematic, and many Centrelink recipients had difficulties understanding correspondence from Centrelink. Many of Centrelink's services are migrating online and as a result the Commonwealth Ombudsman notes that age pension recipients and to a lesser extent disability support pension recipients have difficulty accessing these online services.
 

I am pleased to say that the government has listened to the complaints of those who use Centrelink and has responded. As my colleague Minister Kim Carr said today, the government was aware that the average call wait times this year peaked at an unacceptable 16 minutes. New technology and the deployment of more staff using new methods to respond to phone calls has meant that as of today the average call wait time is down to six minutes and 15 seconds. I also note that Minister Carr informed the Senate in question time today that the call-back service will be extended, allowing more citizens to go about their business while not losing their place in the queue.
 

There is much work that the Commonwealth Ombudsman does. It is not just a complaints hotline. The Ombudsman serves as an important purpose of following up on individual citizen's cases as well as conducting investigations, producing reports to assist agencies ensure transparency and making submissions to parliamentary inquiries. I think the work of the Commonwealth Ombudsman is critically important. I commend its work and I commend the annual report of the Commonwealth Ombudsman

FOI ITSA's investigation Policy/still nothing supplied

My original Freedom of Information request for ITSA' s investigation policy was made on the 5th August 2012.
It is not surprising that ITSA has refused to supply this .
On the 5th November the Office of the Information Commissioner had to make ITSA aware of the obligations to supply this. The request should have been received no latter than the 9th December.
As yet I have received nothing. OAIC had to be contacted last tuesday and again today.
Adam Toma had made it clear that Dave Maher was to supply nothing to me.
I find this rather amusing because  this fucker Adam Toma is National Enforcement Manager at ITSA and this cock is corrupt.
So let us see who has the last laugh when I do property searches on Adam Toma and post them all up on the internet!!!!!!!!!

FOI Commonwealth Ombudsman

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
Subject: RE: Your FOI request of 14 October 2012 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:16:36 +1100

Dear Luke
I refer to  the following taken from the Commonwealth Ombudsmans Annual Report 2010-2011. Under Freedom of Information please supply me with a copy of each of these complaints.

Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia

The number of complaints to the Ombudsman concerning the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA) has remained at around 70 per year for the last three years. The majority of complaints were from those who were themselves bankrupt (almost 75%) and regarded the administration of the estate or issues relating to discharge from bankruptcy. The remainder were from creditors or an associated entity with issues relating to the administration of the estate.
We continue to work with ITSA to bring continuous improvement to its management of complaints.

In the most recent Annual report the Commonwealth Ombudsman ( Colin Neave) has made a decision not to give the statistics  of  complaints on individual  Government Agencies instead concealing the statistics and only giving statistics on Government  Portfolio's.
Under Freedom of Information I would like the Commonwealth Ombudsman to supply me with the statistics  2011-2012   on individual Agencies and departments as in the Annual report 2010-2011.
It is also a requirement  that the Commonwealth Ombudsman refer any matters of systemic corrupt conduct to the relevant Minister.
In the matter of the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia it is the Attorney General.
Please also supply me under Freedom of Information any policy that the Commonwealth Ombudsman  has made not to  comply with this obligation
Thank you
Fiona Brown

So who else besides Adam Toma is on the take.............. Is there somebody at the Commonwealth Ombudsman who is on the take also and they are protecting each other???????????????

IT SHOULD BE INTERESTING NEXT YEAR WHEN  I START ALL MY PROPERTY SEARCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Waiting for my FOI request/ITSA/Dave Maher

I  can hardly wait for Monday to arrive . It will be so exciting to finally have my Freedom of Information Request from ITSA on their Investigation Policy
Originally this was requested from Dave Maher , the Freedom of Information co-ordinator at the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia on the 5th August 2012. This request was never  answered.
The Office of the Information Commissioner had to intervene.

I am certain all male senior Management would all be pulling their cocks  attempting to come up with a policy that complies with their obligations.


Whether it be the fucker Adam Toma , National  Enforcement  Manager who is  on the take and attempting to stand over people  or the other fucker Gavin McCosker National Operations Manager from Queensland   who allows bankrupts to file false statement of Affairs to name a few, senior management at ITSA are all required to comply with an Investigation policy.
Senator Williams is also still waiting  for a reply to   questions asked to skanky Veronique Ingram who also has her fist up her arse  in May  2012.

There have been another 2 FOI requests to ITSA enquiring into the knowledge ITSA was aware of atrocious conduct  and failed to  act accordingly.
It is also interesting that ITSA have failed to update their disclosure log, which could mean they do not receive any FOI requests or that  ITSA fails to respond to any requests.

---

From: dave.maher@itsa.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Subject: FOI request [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 05:28:53 +0000

Dear Ms Brown

I refer to the FOI request which you purported to send to ITSA on 22 July 2012 and your subsequent complaint to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC ) about ITSA’s lack of response (copy of relevant e-mails attached).

ITSA has been contacted by the OAIC about this matter.  ITSA advised the OAIC that your e-mails of 22 July and 5 August were not received, as e-mail correspondence from you has been blocked since October 2009 – you were advised of this by e-mail from Adam Toma (scanned copy attached).

The OAIC asked ITSA whether it would be prepared to consider their contact with us as constituting receipt of your FOI request.  ITSA agreed to this on 7 November 2012 and I therefore acknowledge receipt of your FOI request on that date.

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) ITSA has 30 days from receipt of an FOI request to make a decision whether to grant access to the documents sought.  This period can be extended if consultation is required with third parties; with the consent of the OAIC if the request is complex or voluminous; or with the consent of the applicant.  If I consider that an extension of time to process your request is required I will contact you.  If I decide to refuse access to one or more documents relevant to your request I will advise you in writing of the reasons for that refusal and of your right to seek a review of the decision.

Please note that the e-mail block remains in place, therefore any e-mails you may send to ITSA will not be received.  If you wish to correspond with ITSA about your FOI request you should write to:

The FOI Coordinator
ITSA
GPO Box 821
CANBERRA  ACT  2601

Regards

Dave Maher
FOI Coordinator
ITSA

FOI ITSA Dave Maher

Dave Maher
FOI Officer
GPO 821
Canbera 2601
ITSA

4th December 2012

Dear Mr Maher,
You  and ITSA have been made aware of your obligations of Freedom of Information requests by the Office of the Information Commissioner.

I therefore would now like to make the following requests for documents  held by ITSA. This would be additional to the previous requests I have made and as yet have not received.
I am still waiting for a copy of  ITSA's investigation policy as required by the Financial Management and Accountability Act

I am now requesting the statement of Affairs of George Adler. He is a 3 time bankrupt. I am requesting the Statement of Affairs filed by Adler on his last bankruptcy. I also request any statements or documents requested by Tibor Karolyi before ITSA and Tibor Karoly granted George Adler overseas travel. Also if Florence Choo was involved in the decision.

I also request the periodic updates  by ITSA  to creditors on the Bankruptcy of Jamie- Lee Alexander and what investigations Jason Briggs commenced to  satisfy ITSA that Alexander had not filed a false statement of Affairs.
I refer to an email  on the 30th November 2012 from the Commonwealth Ombudsman  stating that these periodic updates were sent to creditors. Therefore I would like a copy of them.

Also as my previous request on the  18th November any complaints made to ITSA or Bankruptcy regulations on George Adler.

Thank you
Fiona Brown

 This is my previous letter to you so it will refresh  your memory::::::::::::

Letter to Dave Maher
RE:::: Freedom of Information
Mr Dave Maher
FOI Co-ordinator 
GPO Box 821 
Canberra 2601
ITSA

18th November 2012

Dear Mr Maher,
You are aware under FOI I have requested a copy of ITSA's investigation policy.

This should not be confused with Itsa's fraud policy.

 Unfortunately it has been necessary for the  Office of the Information Minister  to made you aware of your obligations under the Freedom of Information Act.

According to the FMA Act  ITSA  is required to publish a disclosure log. I am aware ITSA has not posted anything on it since April 2012. Please supply me a copy of ITSA's disclosure log for the period April 2010-April 2012.
The FMA Act and the AGIS requires investigators to have a certain level of qualification. I  therefore request under FOI to be supplied the qualifications of all Bankruptcy Regulation staff in Australia.
In particular I am interested in the qualifications of Mark Findlay and Adam Toma.

Also under FOI   supply me with copies  from  the register of complaints which have been lodged on Paul Pattison, Stuart Ariff Florence Choo Tibor Karolyi.

Please also supply me under FOI a copy of the register which discloses the dates Veronique Ingram received complaints on the conduct of Senior Management at ITSA, Paul Pattison and Stuart Ariff.
Thank you
Fiona Brown

Email to Gavin mcCosker RE: Jamie Lee Alexander Statement of Affairs

Gavin McCosker

National Manager

Corporate Strategy and support

Insolvency Trustee Service Australia

Re Statement of Affairs of Jamie Lee Alexander

Dear Mr McCosker ,

I refer to your email dated 22^nd November 2012.

I would like to bring to your attention errors in this email.

It is the obligation of ITSA as the Official Trustee in the Bankruptcy to ensure Alexander did not file a false statement of Affairs. Therefore I request you email me  the creditors reports that ITSA would have emailed periodically to creditors as referred to in the email from the Ombudsman dated 30.11.2012.

I also request what investigations ITSA made to assess that Alexander was not liable to pay his creditors.

Considering that Alexander sold property within the 5 year clawback what inquiries did Jason Briggs commence to establish where this money is concealed ?

Furthermore, your referral of Alexander as “She” is incorrect.

I realise it now has tits, though I do not find this unusual as some men who are obese have acquired these though I have never met a woman who has a big hairy cock hanging between their legs.

Fiona Brown